Shibu Soren’s Response to the Allegations
Shibu Soren has argued that the case against him is malicious and politically motivated. He claims that the allegations made are unfounded and have been inspired by a desire to tarnish his reputation. Soren believes that the Lokpal could not have considered the case as it pertains to a period prior to the date of the complaint.
Charges of Prejudice
According to Shibu Soren, the case against him is tainted by prejudice and ill-will. He suggests that the motives behind the accusations are driven by a political agenda rather than a genuine concern for justice. Soren asserts that the timing of the complaint, which refers to events that occurred before the filing date, is evidence of the ulterior motives at play.
The Role of the Lokpal
Shibu Soren argues that the Lokpal cannot entertain the case against him due to its timeline. As the alleged incidents took place before the date of the complaint, Soren contends that the Lokpal does not have jurisdiction to consider the matter. He maintains that the allegations are baseless and should not have been entertained in the first place.
Political Influence on the Case
Soren claims that the case against him is a product of political machinations. He suggests that his opponents are using the legal system to further their own political interests and to discredit him. According to Soren, the malicious nature of the allegations and their timing indicate that they are part of a wider political conspiracy.
शिबू सोरेन ने दावा किया है कि उनके खिलाफ लगाए गए मामले दुर्भावनापूर्ण हैं और इसके पीछे राजनीतिक मोटिवेशन है। उन्होंने कहा है कि लोकपाल उनके मामले का विचार नहीं कर सकता, क्योंकि आरोप शिकायत की तारीख से पहले का है।
