What’s inside:
Rabri Devi has filed a petition to change the judge in the IRCTC scam case, raising concerns about the trial’s pace.
A new update has come in the IRCTC scam case. Rabri Devi, a former Chief Minister of Bihar, has filed a petition in the Rouse Avenue Court in Delhi. She is asking for Judge Vishal Gogane, who is currently handling the case, to be removed. The court is set to hear this petition on Tuesday.
This petition is significant because it comes just after the court framed charges against several key people, including Lalu Prasad Yadav and Tejashwi Yadav. The case was moving quickly towards its conclusion with daily hearings, and this demand to change the judge has raised questions and created a new controversy. Legal experts believe it might be a tactic to delay the trial.
Rabri Devi’s petition hasn’t been shared with the public yet, but many are curious about her reasons for wanting the judge changed. There have been previous requests for delays in the trial, which have already slowed things down. This new petition is viewed with interest because it involves the Lalu family, and the trial is still ongoing.
Recently, the court turned down a request from Lalu Prasad Yadav and Rabri Devi to stop the daily hearings. They argued that the continuous hearings were causing them practical issues. However, the court stated that delays in cases involving public figures cannot be tolerated as it undermines public trust in the justice system.
In the IRCTC scam, charges have been filed against 14 individuals, including Lalu Prasad Yadav and several IRCTC officials. The case involves serious allegations of irregularities in hotel leasing during Yadav’s time as Railway Minister. Following the charges, the trial was progressing rapidly, but this new petition by Rabri Devi could change the dynamics. The court’s decision on the petition will be crucial for the case going forward.
Summary:
- Rabri Devi has filed a petition to change the judge in the IRCTC scam case.
- The petition will be heard by the court on Tuesday.
- The trial was moving quickly before this new petition was filed.
- The court previously rejected requests to stop daily hearings.
- The outcome of this petition could impact the trial’s future progress.
